662649 JDMXXX10.1177/8756479316662649Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyPhillips
research-article2016
Case Study
Congenital Pulmonary Airway
Malformation: A Case Study
and Case Comparison
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography
2016, Vol. 32(5) 294 –298
© The Author(s) 2016
Reprints and permissions:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/8756479316662649
jdms.sagepub.com
Paige Phillips, RDMS, RVT1
Abstract
Congenital pulmonary airway malformation (CPAM) is a rare congenital lung mass of the fetus that can present as solid
or cystic. This is often diagnosed prenatally with sonography and routinely followed through the term of the pregnancy.
Congenital pulmonary airway malformation is now classified into five different types that all originate from different
areas of the lung and can vary in appearance. CPAM does present with a few differentials that need to be assessed,
including bronchopulmonary sequestration, bronchogenic cyst, and congenital diaphragmatic hernia. It is vital to fully
assess the fetal thorax and determine if there are any abnormalities present and if so the originating vasculature. This
case report demonstrates a type 3-CPAM and its sonographic appearance as well as the classifications of CPAM and
the possible differential diagnoses.
Keywords
congenital  cystic  adenomatoid  malformation,  CCAM,  congenital  pulmonary  airway  malformation,  CPAM,
bronchopulmonary sequestration, fetal lung lesion
Introduction
Congenital pulmonary airway malformation (CPAM) is a
benign nonhereditary congenital mass of the lung that can
present as cystic or solid mass.1, 2 This lesion is described
as  an  overgrowth  of  terminal  bronchopulmonary  tissue.3
Congenital cystic lung lesions are rare; however, CPAM is
the most common fetal lung lesion.4 Congenital pulmonary
airway malformation is now classified into five different
types that vary, depending on origin of the mass as well as
presence of cysts, dimensions, and the sonographic appear-
ance.2 This particular lung mass is typically unilateral and
most  often  discovered  in  the  lower  lobes  of  the  lungs.
Bilateral CPAM is rare and is associated with a poor prog-
nosis.5 Congenital pulmonary airway malformation occurs
in approximately 1 in 11 000 to 1 in 35 000 pregnancies.6
The average gestational age for discovery of the lung mass
is 22 weeks. The following case report demonstrates a type
3-CPAM and its associated sonographic appearance.
Case Report
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) ultrasound equipment was
utilized  and  a  curved  linear  array  transducer.  The  fre-
quency was shifted to 5.2 MHz. The sonogram showed an
echogenic,  homogenous,  wedge-shaped  mass  that  was
discovered in the area of the fetal thorax, just superior to
the fetal diaphragm (Figure 1).
This patient was sent for a targeted sonogram of the sus-
pected lung lesion. It was discovered during the targeted
sonogram that the lung lesion measured 2.16 × 1.99 × 1.71
cm  and  was  located  in  the  right  lower  chest  (Figures  1
and  2).  No  mass  effect  was  visualized  on  surrounding
structures  or  the  vasculature.  The  mass  had  no  sono-
graphic  evidence  of  cystic  architecture.  During  the  tar-
geted  sonogram,  the  vascular  origin  of  the  mass  was
thoroughly assessed to aid in the diagnosis of this lesion.
It was determined that the mass originated from the pul-
monary vasculature versus the thoracic aorta (Figure 3).
Determining the origin of vascularity helped to differ-
entiate the diagnosis from a CPAM versus a bronchopul-
monary sequestration.7 Interrogating the vascular origin 
This case involves a 32-year-old female patient, gravida 5
para 4 with no prior pregnancy complications. The esti-
mated gestational age of this singleton fetus is 21 weeks
and  2  days,  based  on  last  menstrual  cycle.  The  patient
presented to the department for a routine anatomy scan of
a 21-week fetus. A General Electric P5 (GE Healthcare, 
1El Centro College, Dallas, TX, USA
Received November 25, 2014, and accepted for publication July 13, 2016.
Corresponding Author:
Paige Phillips, RDMS, RVD, El Centro College, 301 N Market St, Dallas,
TX 75202, USA.
Email: paigephillips414@gmail.com
Phillips
295
Figure 1.  Sagittal sonographic view of a wedge-shaped
echogenic lesion in the thorax of a 21-week gestational fetus.
Figure 3.  Color Doppler interrogation of a wedge-shaped
echogenic lesion in the thorax of a 21-week gestational fetus,
in the sagittal plane.
It additionally allowed for distinguishing where the lesion
arose relative to the bronchial tree.9 The additional clas-
sifications are referred to as type 0 to 4. Therefore, CCAM
is more recently renamed and reclassified to CPAM with
five different distinct categories.9
Based on the Stocker classification, a type 3-CPAM is
the  best  differential  diagnosis  for  this  particular  case.2
A follow-up sonogram was ordered for this patient in four
weeks to check the size of the lesion and see if there were
any changes in its sonographic characteristics. Four weeks
later,  there  were  no  sonographic  changes  to  the  lung
lesion. The patient was asked to come back in four more
weeks  for  further  follow-up.  Unfortunately,  the  patient
discontinued  the  follow-up  appointment,  and  the  mass
could not be observed for any possible regression in size.
Figure 2.  Transverse sonographic view of the same
echogenic lesion in the thorax of a 21-week gestational fetus.
Discussion
of  the  mass  allowed  the  sonographer  to  discover  if  the
mass originated from pulmonary vasculature or systemic
vasculature. A  CPAM  is  provided  blood  flow  from  the
pulmonary  artery.  Bronchopulmonary  sequestrations
have  a  blood  supply  that  originates  from  the  thoracic
aorta. Therefore, the vascular origin of the mass should
be  thoroughly  assessed  to  differentiate  the  mass  from
other possible pathologies. In 1977, Stocker et al.8 classi-
fied three different types of congenital cystic adenoma-
toid  malformation  (CCAM).  It  was  broken  down  into
types 1 to 3. In the year 2002, the Stocker classification
was  updated  to  add  two  additional  classification  types
and  changed  the  name  from  CCAM  to  CPAM.9  The
update  was  based  on  the  discovery  that  there  were  two
additional classifications of the lung lesion and that not
all  of  the  lesions  were  cystic  or  of  adenomatoid  origin.  
Sonography  is  the  gold  standard  imaging  modality  for
obstetrics. There are certain situations where other imag-
ing modalities may be useful to aid in a definitive diagno-
sis. In the situation of a CPAM lesion, sonography is the
imaging modality of choice with MRI being an alterna-
tive option.10,11 Sonography is used to determine the size,
shape, echogenicity, circulation origin, and any possible
changes that may occur in the mass throughout the preg-
nancy. A MRI is useful in determining the exact anatomy
of the lung where the pathological process is located. In a
study that was reported by O’Conner et al.,10 sonography
was advocated as a superior imaging choice for demon-
strating the feeding circulation of the mass.8
Congenital pulmonary airway malformation is broken
down into five different types. Type 0 arises from the tra-
chea or the bronchus of the lung, and it is the least com-
mon form of CPAM, occurring in approximately 1% to 
296
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography 32(5)
3% of cases. Sonographically, this type will present as a
solid echogenic mass with lungs that are small. This form
of  the  condition  is  typically  considered  lethal.  Type
1-CPAM is the most common form and arises from the
distal bronchus or the proximal bronchiole. Fifty percent
to  70%  of  CPAM  cases  are  type  1.  The  sonographic
appearance of type 1 is identified as one to a few large
cysts present in the lung mass. Type 2-CPAM comes from
the terminal bronchioles and accounts for approximately
15% to 30% of cases. This type of lesion contains cysts
that  are  smaller  in  size  and  also  has  solid  areas.  The
abnormality most associated with other fetal anomalies is
type  2-CPAM.  Type  3-CPAM  arises  from  the  alveolus
and is rare. This type only occurs in about 5% to 10% of
cases.  Sonographically,  this  type  of  mass  appears  as  an
echogenic and solid mass because these cysts are micro-
scopic. Type 4 arises from the alveolar and contains mul-
tiple  large  cysts.  This  type  accounts  for  5%  to  15%  of
CPAM cases. In the past, type 4-CPAM has been associ-
ated with malignancy.12,13
There are a few differential diagnoses to CPAM. The
most important differential diagnosis is a bronchopulmo-
nary sequestration. Bronchopulmonary sequestrations are
nonfunctioning lung tissue masses that are fed by the sys-
temic vasculature. They are usually present in the lower
lobes of the lungs. It can be very difficult to differentiate
CPAM  from  a  pulmonary  sequestration. A  bronchopul-
monary  sequestration  appears  as  a  solid,  echogenic,
homogenous, well circumscribed mass that can be round
or wedge-shaped sonographically. The most difficult type
of CPAM to differentiate from a pulmonary sequestration
is type 3-CPAM. It is very important to identify the vas-
cular origin of the mass to determine if the mass is fed
from the pulmonary vasculature or if it is fed by systemic
vasculature.  Pulmonary  sequestration  is  also  associated
with  other  fetal  anomalies.  An  additional  differential
diagnosis to CPAM is a bronchogenic cyst. In a broncho-
genic cyst, abnormal budding occurs during the develop-
ment  of  the  tracheobronchial  tree.  The  least  likely
differential  diagnosis  for  this  entity  is  a  congenital  dia-
phragmatic hernia.2,6,14
A CPAM lesion typically cannot be found with sonog-
raphy until 17 weeks’ gestation.15 When a CPAM is found
sonographically, routine sonograms are performed on the
fetus to closely watch the lung mass. Changes can present
in the mass, and it is important to follow and document
any changes that may occur. It is typical for the mass to
regress in size, and this usually begins to occur between
25 and 28 gestational weeks.7,14,16 Prognosis is going to
depend on the CPAM classification and if there are other
fetal anomalies present.7 A larger sized lesion that does
not  regress  in  size  is  more  likely  to  lead  to  a  fatal  out-
come.17 Hydrops fetalis could develop in the fetus from
the mass compressing other structures; this will typically 
require an emergency cesarean section.16 Other possible
fetal anomalies that could be present with type 2-CPAM
are  gastrointestinal  defects,  defects  of  the  abdominal
wall, fetal heart anomalies, and anomalies of the central
nervous system, spine, and kidneys.13
A type 3-CPAM case study was reported by Bennett1
in 2003. The patient was in her early 30s at the time of her
second  pregnancy.  A  sonogram  was  performed  on  her
20-week 6-day fetus, and a hyperechoic mass was visual-
ized in the inferior posterior left lung. It was noted that
there were no cystic structures visualized. This was con-
sidered to be most likely a type 3-CCAM, with a possible
differential  diagnosis  of  pulmonary  sequestration.  This
patient went for MRI, and it was determined that the mass
did  not  demonstrate  any  vessels  that  were  originating
from the thoracic aorta. This particular patient had rou-
tine sonograms once a month to follow the progress of the
CCAM  lesion. There  was  a  sonogram  performed  a  few
days  prior  to  birth,  and  the  lung  lesion  was  difficult  to
image  and  appeared  to  be  significantly  smaller  in  size
from the original finding. The fetus had a good prognosis
at birth. Although these cases are similar, the 2003 case
could not demonstrate a vascular origin of the mass sono-
graphically.  With  the  quality  and  resolution  of  current
ultrasound equipment, it is feasible that it could be easier
to determine the vascular origin of a fetal lung mass.8
An  additional  fetal  lung  mass  case  was  reported  by
Fulghum and Vasquez.13 This particular case was a case
of triplets with no maternal complications. During a rou-
tine  sonogram,  a  cystic  lung  mass  imaged  in  the  lower
lobe  of  the  left  lung  of  fetus  C.  Sonographic  measure-
ments determined that the cyst was 3 × 4 cm. This lesion
was followed by routine sonography throughout the term
of  the  pregnancy.  There  were  no  further  complications
documented throughout the pregnancy, and the lung mass
of  fetus  C  remained  unchanged.  A  chest  CT  was  per-
formed  on  this  infant,  and  images  showed  a  mass  that
covered half of the lower lobe of the left lung. The CT
confirmed  what  had  been  discovered  sonographically.
Three  months  later,  this  infant  underwent  surgery  to
resect the lung mass. Upon pathologic evaluation, it was
determined that the lung mass was CCAM. This case is
another  example  showing  that  sonography  is  a  good
imaging modality for identifying fetal lung lesions. This
case differs from the one being reported in that the mass
appeared to have cystic components on the sonogram. A
chest CT was the modality of choice as opposed to the use
of imaging the mass with MRI.10
Based  on  these  descriptive  cases,  sonographers
should consider the importance of thoroughly assessing
the fetal lungs as part of a routine obstetric sonogram. It
is important to realize that CPAM can present in several
different variations depending on the lesion’s typology.
When  performing  a  sonogram,  it  is  important  for  the 
Phillips
297
Conclusion
Congenital  pulmonary  airway  malformation,  once
referred to as CCAM, represents approximately 25% of
congenital  lung  lesions.  CPAM  is  classified  into  five
different types depending on origin, cyst presence, and
cyst  size.  The  most  common  differential  diagnosis  to
CPAM  is  the  bronchopulmonary  sequestration.  CPAM
is typically found at around 22 gestational weeks and is
followed up with routine sonography through the term
of  the  pregnancy.  CPAM  can  vary  in  sonographic
appearance as well as prognosis depending on the clas-
sification of the lesion. Sonography plays a vital role in
the identification and screening for CPAM. Sonography
and  MRI  are  recommended  as  imaging  modalities  for
classifying the type of mass that is present.
Acknowledgments
The  author  would  like  to  thank  Jacqueline  Monaco,  RDMS,
RVT, El Centro College, and family for their support.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect
to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
The  author  received  no  financial  support  for  the  research,
authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
References
  1.  Bennett  CT:  Prenatal  sonography  finding  of  fetal  lung
mass  at  20  weeks  gestation.  J  Diagn  Med  Sonography
2003;19:101–106.
  2.  Chikkannaiah  P,  Kangle  R,  Hawal  M:  Congenital  cystic
adenomatoid  malformation  of  lung:  report  of  two  cases
with review of the literature. Lung India 2013;30:215–218.
  3.  Henningsen  C,  Kuntz  K,  Youngs  D:  Clinical  Guide  to
Sonography  Exercises  for  Critical  Thinking,  2nd  ed.
Amsterdam, Elsevier Mosby, 2014.
4. Hagen-Ansert SL: Textbook of Diagnostic Ultrasonography,
7th ed. Amsterdam, Elsevier Mosby, 2012.
  5.  Sabbagha R: Diagnostic Ultrasound Applied to Obstetrics
and Gynecology, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA, J.B. Lippincott
Company, 1994.
  6.  Sfakianaki  AK,  Copel  JA:  Congenital  cystic  lesions  of
the  lung:  congenital  cystic  adenomatoid  malformation
and bronchopulmonary sequestration. Rev Obstet Gynecol
2012;5:85–93.
7. Jain A, Anand K, Singla S, Kumar A: Congenital cystic
lung diseases. J Clin Imaging Sci 2013;3.
  8.  Stocker  JT,  Madewell  JE,  Drake  RM:  Congenital  cystic
adenomatoid  malformation  of  the  lung:  classification  and
morphologic spectrum. Hum Pathol 1977;8:155–171.
Figure 4.  Scheme for categorizing the sonographic
appearances of congenital pulmonary airway malformation
(CPAM).
Note. This diagram is a method for depicting the variety of
sonographic characteristics attributed to the five types of CPAM
lesions. Types 1 and 4 are typically cystic appearing, types 0 and 3 are
typically solid appearing, and type 2 could have a mix of both a cystic
and solid appearance.
sonographer to image and document the echogenicity of
the fetal lungs and assess for areas of localized increased
echogenicity.  If  a  mass  is  found  in  the  lung,  besides
marking, measuring, and applying color Doppler to the
lesion, it is also important to determine the circulation
of  the  mass.  Documenting  the  circulation  afforded  the
mass helps to provide information that could differenti-
ate it from pulmonary sequestration. It is also important
to measure the mass as precisely as possible to establish
a  basis  for  assessing  any  changes  that  may  be  seen  in
follow-up sonograms. Measuring the mass from leading
edge  to  leading  edge  repeatedly  would  be  helpful  to
ensure  measurement  accuracy.  The  sonographer  wants
to check for cystic components in the lesion to help bet-
ter differentiate the diagnosis. If possible, Harmonic tis-
sue imaging can also be applied to help in determining
if cystic components are present in the lesion. The recent
change  in  designation  and  classification  of  this  entity
has  provided  two  additional  classifications  than  were
originally  determined  with  CCAM;  therefore,  this  is
important  information  for  sonographers.  A  list  of  the
different  types  classified  based  on  their  sonographic
appearance11 is provided:
–  Type 1: cystic with large cysts
–  Type 2: cystic and solid with other anomalies
–  Type 3: echogenic solid mass
–  Type 4: large cystic mass
–  Type 0: solid mass with small lungs.
See Figure 4 for a diagram comparing the different types
of CPAM.
298
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography 32(5)
  9.  Stocker  JT:  Congenital  pulmonary  airway  malforma-
tion:  a  new  name  for  and  an  expanded  classification  of
congenital  cystic  adenomatoid  malformation  of  the  lung.
Histopathology 2002;41(suppl 2):424–431.
 10.  O’Connor SC, Rooks VJ, Smith AB: Magnetic resonance
imaging of the fetal central nervous system, head, neck, and
chest. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 2012;33:86–101.
 11.  ACR. ACR–SPR practice parameter for the safe and optimal
performance  of  fetal  magnetic  resonance  imaging  (MRI).
http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PGTS/
guidelines/MRI_Fetal.pdf. Accessed July 19, 2016.
 12.  Moore  L,  Handy  R:  Congenital  cystic  adenomatoid  mal-
formation  a  brief  review  with  images.  J  Diagn  Med
Sonography 2009;25:168–172.
 13.  Fulghum  H,  Vasquez  E:  Congenital  cystic  adenoma-
toid  malformation:  a  case  study.  The  Internet  Journal  of
Advanced Nursing Practice 2002;5:1–6.
 14.  Klein JD, Barnewolt CE, Jennings RW: Current and future
treatment  of  fetal  thoracic  masses.  Expert  Rev  Obstet
Gynecol 2009;4:201–217.
15. Rumack C, Wilson S, Charboneau JW: Diagnostic Ultrasound.
Vol. 2, 3rd ed. Amsterdam, Elsevier Mosby, 2005.
 16.  Hou  D:  Congenital  cystic  adenomatoid  malformation,  in
Davies  M,  Inglis  J,  Jardine  L,  Koorts  P  (eds.):  Antenatal
Consults:  A  Guide  for  Neonatologists  and  Pediatricians.
Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2012, pp 171–175.
 17.  Adzick NS, Harrison MR, Crombleholme TM, et al: Fetal
lung  lesions:  management  and  outcome.  Am  J  Obstet
Gynecol 1998;179:884–889.